2026年柬埔寨银行资产排名 ABA与ACLEDA位居前二
分类金融
地点金边
来源Cambodia Investment Review
发布时间2026/09/22 11:31
详情描述
据柬埔寨投资评论（Cambodia Investment Review）报道，SuperBankRatings于2026年9月21日在金边发布了“2026年柬埔寨超级银行指数”资产划分结果。该榜单针对资产规模超过50亿美元的四家商业银行进行了评估。
ABA银行以4.50分的成绩位居榜首，ACLEDA银行以4.39分位列第二。加华银行（Canadia Bank）与KB PRASAC银行以4.30分的相同得分并列第三。这四家银行的得分差距仅为0.20分，其中第一名ABA银行与第二名ACLEDA银行之间的分差为0.11分。
此次评估指标涵盖了财务实力、治理结构、资金与流动性、市场地位、可持续性、风险管理及技术水平，而非仅考量资产负债表规模。
评估结果显示，ABA银行凭借市场领导地位、盈利规模、加拿大国家银行的母公司支持以及技术能力获得首位。同时，评估指出ABA银行在第三阶段信贷增长、行业集中度、偿付能力空间以及量化气候与分类成果方面存在需监测的领域。ACLEDA银行的排名则得益于其全国性的业务布局。
📋 简要摘要 ▸
SuperBankRatings发布2026年柬埔寨银行资产排名，ABA银行以4.50分位居榜首，ACLEDA银行紧随其后，加华银行与KB PRASAC银行并列第三。
📋 完整原文 ▸
[来源: CIR] [分类提示: NEWS]
标题: SuperBankRatings Reveals Cambodia’s $5 Billion-Plus Super Heavyweight Banking Rankings
Cambodia Investment Review | Phnom Penh, September 21, 2026
SuperBankRatings has released the final asset-division results of its Cambodia SuperPower Banking Index 2026, ranking the country’s four commercial banks with more than $5 billion in assets.
ABA Bank placed first in the Super Heavyweight division with a score of 4.50 out of 5, followed by ACLEDA Bank at 4.39. Canadia Bank and KB PRASAC Bank shared third place, each scoring 4.30.
The division’s four eligible banks
No. 1 — ABA Bank: 4.50 out of 5
No. 2 — ACLEDA Bank: 4.39 out of 5
Joint No. 3 — Canadia Bank: 4.30 out of 5
Joint No. 3 — KB PRASAC Bank: 4.30 out of 5
Only 0.20 points separate the four banks, while the gap between first-placed ABA and ACLEDA is 0.11 points.
SuperBankRatings said the results reflect the banks’ combined performance across financial strength, governance, funding and liquidity, market position, sustainability, risk management and technology—not their balance-sheet size alone.
Different strengths shape the results
ABA’s first-place result reflects its market leadership, profitable scale, support from parent company National Bank of Canada and technological capability.
The assessment identified rising Stage 3 credit, sector concentration, lower solvency headroom and limited quantified climate and taxonomy outcomes as areas to monitor.
ACLEDA’s second-place position was supported by its nationwide franc